Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : AT&T -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: limtex who wrote (1519)	6/30/1998 8:19:00 PM
From: Raptech	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 4298

Could Armstrong's move into the TCI deal be as dumb as many here seem to express? Appears that Armstrong just came out of his cave to make the deal and take T down. I expect not!!! Too many uninformed opinions here without waiting for more details to unfold. Armstrong has an excellent track record which was earned through good decisions. I feel certain the obvious criticisms (price, infrastructure, bandwith, etc) noted here were strongly considered by T when the deal was reviewed and approved. Also, I doubt he made the deal just for the sake of a deal. He's too smart to get sucked into a situation without potential. All I know is my $36 buy is still looking good, for which I credit Armstrong, so I am sticking with him! And, T still has a heck of a telecom franchise to generate revenue while developing TCI, We'll see $80 long before $40. Rap

To: limtex who wrote (1519)	7/1/1998 1:53:00 AM
From: wonk	Respond to of 4298

Limtex: ...surely please tell me that the board and management and CEO of T yes T haven't put the company ionto a position where it's stock is going to give back all the gains made over the last six months or so... It's quite possible. The industry is growing tremendously, yet T has not been able to grow revenues. Earnings improvements in the near term are expected from expense cuts. So what happens when all the cutting is done? T has been, and remains, the most vulnerable to RBOC entry into LD. In a year, SNET took something over 30% of the residential LD in Connecticut after the passage of the 96 Act. Replay that across the board and you have a disaster on your hands, since T is top-heavy residential. The TCG acquisition permits on-net provision of services to businesses. TCG also has Biznet (38 GHz licenses) which expand the reach of TCG's fiber rings. Perhaps now T can start to reclaim some mkt share in commercial accounts. TCI will help to staunch the blood flow when the RBOCs enter LD. Now T needs an international deal to fill the hole in their strategy there. Notwithstanding the fact that both deals were pricey, what else could they do? At least it is looking better that T has an offensive rather than a defensive future. just my opinion, ww

To: limtex who wrote (1519)	7/1/1998 7:30:00 PM
From: Raptech	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4298

<<...surely please tell me that the board and management and CEO of T yes T haven't put the company ionto a position where it's stock is going to give back all the gains made over the last six months or so..>>. THERE'S PLENTY TO BE OPTOMISTIC ABOUT!!!! AT&T All-in-One Plan Could Work By DAVID E. KALISH AP Business Writer NEW YORK (AP) -- Forget that skeptical investors have sent AT (NYSE:T - news)&T shares plunging 13 percent since the company agreed to buy cable giant Tele-Communications Inc. (Nasdaq:LBTYA - news; Nasdaq:TCOMA - news) for $31.7 billion. Never mind the all-in-one telephone, Internet and video services AT&T Corp. envisions may be several years away and cost billions -- with no set plan for what to charge consumers. One week after AT&T announced a plan to use TCI's cable-TV lines to send futuristic services to millions of consumers, the nation's largest telecommunications company insisted that what might seem like a pipe dream would swiftly transform people's living rooms into high-tech havens. AT&T executives, on the offense against persistent skepticism, on Wednesday contended their plan would help beat the regional Baby Bells at selling local phone service as part of a package of related offerings. ''We're very confident we can deliver exactly the capabilities on the timetable that we've stated,'' AT&T chief technology officer David Nagel told industry analysts and reporters in the company's fourth teleconference in the week since the June 24 announcement of the deal. Trying to reassure industry experts, AT&T fleshed out its plans to spend $4.4 billion plus undetermined further investments these next few years to modernize TCI's cable network and equip millions of homes to handle telephone, high-speed Internet and a wide array of video-entertainment. The details did little to assuage nervous investors, who continued to bid down AT&T's stock. As the stock market posted sharp gains, AT&T slipped 37 1/2 cents to close at $56.75 a share Wednesday on the New York Stock Exchange. AT&T said it would cost about $1.8 billion to update TCI's cable lines to carry signals in two directions, needed for the new services. AT&T would cover $1.3 billion of those costs, with TCI paying the rest before the deal closes, as expected, early next year. TCI so far has updated only about 10 percent of its network, but expects to have most of it ready by 2000. AT&T is spending another $1.3 billion to maintain and extend the telecommunications network to bring services into people's homes. In addition, the combined company plans to spend $1.8 billion on digital devices in the home. Another cost is the $300 to $500 per household for in-home equipment to carry phone service via cable lines. AT&T did not give a total pricetag, saying that it would provide the equipment as demand warrants. Still undecided is whether to charge subscribers up front for the full cost of the needed in-home devices, or to spread out the cost over monthly charges -- similar to mobile-phone service, in which companies practically give away cellular phones in return for long-term contracts. Analysts said that obstacles lay in AT&T's path. One is the company's own poor record so far in combining into a single bill the charges for its existing range of services. In addition, the hoped-for phone service relies on a technology that is still in its infancy and has not yet been widely deployed via cable lines. The companies plan to transmit calls through the Internet, instead of through conventional telephone switches. But today, Internet calls made over the phone can sound distorted. In addition, there can be awkward delays in when a speaker's voice actually reaches the listener. The companies believe they can overcome these obstacles using new technology, and several industry analysts, though wary, said they think AT&T is on the right track. ''I think there is a high probability of success here. The questions in my mind would revolve much more around 'when' than 'if,''' said Chris Mines, an industry analyst with Forrester Research Inc. (Nasdaq:FORR - news) in Cambridge, Mass. If AT&T's plan works, it could mark the reinvention of the unwieldy mother of the nation's telephone system into a leading scout for tomorrow's technology. Moreover, it may be AT&T's last best hope for reinvigorating its still-dominant but sagging long-distance business while expanding into new telecommunications services, such as local calls. AT&T had been rebuffed in an earlier attempt to buy regional Baby Bell, SBC Communications, to try to crack the local-phone market. In addition, it has pulled back from trying to rent the local lines of Baby Bells and resell service, saying they're charging too much. ''AT&T has to make this work,'' said Ken McGee, an industry analyst at the Gartner Group (Nasdaq:GART - news) research and consulting firm, based in Stamford, Conn. ''There's nothing left. It's like trying to buy lakefront property and it's all been sold.''