Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : PFE (Pfizer) How high will it go? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ally who wrote (3824)	6/30/1998 10:25:00 PM
From: Cosmo Daisey	Respond to of 9523

DLJ may have a big client that wants to position in PFE. Someone moved it higher at the close to get a final print above the daily average weighted price. This is usually done to close the stock higher than the average price of a big client positioning so the broker looks good. I saw it happening before the close and bought back the trading stock I sold recently and i'm up a point. DLJ isn't supposed to be contrary to their public statement but the penalty is light. Fido paid 10,000 for the Vinik fiasco when he said buy high tech when he was selling and going long bonds. He got his clock cleaned anyway. cdaiseyPhD@nobody's-watching.com

To: Ally who wrote (3824)	7/1/1998 1:04:00 AM
From: zurdo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9523

dt,...To underscore and bolster our mutual distrust of this particular "financial advisor" all we have to do is examine the respective whisper numbers for WLA and PFE, made available to us by Yore's url (Thanks, Yore)...WLA has consensus number of .37 and a lower whisper number of .36...not much of an expectation...PFE, on the other hand, has a consensus number of .44, with a whopping whisper number of .57!!! Where does that DLJ idiot Kent Blair get the idea that WLA is a better investment than PFE??? Unless he is not an idiot, but a manipulative sleaze ball... In my opinion, he is one or the other, and deserves no credibility...He has misled a large number of investors...deliberately or otherwise...