Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : NAR FORUM -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Earlie who wrote (6)	7/6/1998 8:40:00 AM
From: Andreas Lichtblau	Respond to of 34

Earlie: Results to date (before the new program) have been very encouraging: massive sulfide intersections (ore-grade, but over ~1m widths only) in many holes at shallow depth (~80m). To prove up an orebody, this next round of drilling will have to start pulling ~10m intersections of the same grade, on the same, or near-by, sections, and at depth. That is, they'll probably step-out and down ~100m from the good intersections obtained to date. Falconbridge must surely be in good spirits getting their programs in Zimbabwe funded by NAR! They didn't have to lay-off their exploration team (geologists, the mine-finders, are always the first to go!). But seriously, the drill intersections to date (see NAR's latest Press Release at http:\\www.nar-resources.com) offer a number of targets, all with excellent potential to host an ore-body. Falconbridge will choose the best of these to drill-test, best in terms of width/grade of known sulfide intersection, intensity and thickness of altered host rocks, presence of geophysical conductors, and mineralized structures, etc. More later....