Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TideGlider who wrote (4331)	7/1/1998 10:19:00 PM
From: Cytotekk	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6528

TG, with all due respect, I cannot call this a SOCIAL thread. With all the accusations of lying, bullying, suspicions, rehashing of yesterdays negative cold mashed potatoes, and very personal insults categorized as banter how can anyone call this thread social, social what, socially dysfunctional?? When you say social are you meaning congenial, friendly, an enriching pleasant discourse? Please qualify your use of the word SOCIAL. I think SI should give annual awards to the threads: Most Congenial Most Informative Most Lame Most Disingenuous Most Profitable Most Hype Most Hip Most Humorous Most Serious Most Off Topic Most Dysfunctional Most Vicious Most Fighting and on and on. I think TVSI could take one of these awards, you figure out which one. I agree with you that there is not much of substance to discuss here, the company is indeed a shell and probably overvalued at .019 per share at this point, but many hope that the current management will be able to create a profitable company. I am one of them. I do not want to see investors lose their money if this company tanks. Your post was well written but I take issue with your thesis sentence. Respectfully, Cytotekk

To: TideGlider who wrote (4331)	7/1/1998 10:41:00 PM
From: s martin	Respond to of 6528

Nice analysis TG, this thread was non-existent before it was created for the specific purpose of duping people into buying the stock based on a press release which has proved to be without any foundation whatsoever. It continues to exist, IMO because those who are still holding stock they were duped into buying, wish to unload that stock on other unsuspecting investors. The objection to the presence of the nays it seems is that we may prevent that from happening. Those who object so strongly to the nature of the thread have offered little except their opinions of others who post. Black pots and kettles come to mind.