SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Steve1 who wrote (21381)7/1/1998 9:19:00 PM
From: Nutty Buddy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27968
 
>>Any thoughts? I have one. Buy back!!!<<

Maybe Arif is buying them personally.

Why don't he just buy the float and go private? It's only a measly $7 million float for a company that is supposed to do $80 million this year in revs. Anyone know Arif's salary on top of all these shares?

I hope business is booming.

BTW. My wife said she overheard her boss mention Firamada in a discussion. He said his girlfriend said it was recommended to her as a potential investment. Now Firamada is not around here and my wife has never mentioned this company to anyone. So apparently word is out, or it was one of those one-in-a-million freak coincidences.

Buddy



To: Steve1 who wrote (21381)7/1/1998 9:49:00 PM
From: Victor Tenorio  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 27968
 
170k today, does not feel like buy back to me. Half of the volume is a wash, the rest is only 15k. And how do you explain few almost zero volume days? The only question in my mind, at this time is, do we hold 20 or we go to 10 before the financials? Vic in Texas waiting for the moment of truth.



To: Steve1 who wrote (21381)7/2/1998 5:45:00 AM
From: TraderGreg  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 27968
 
An interesting thought...the company buying back. Since we know they sold a lot of shares in the 40s and 50s, they can now "cover", pull those shares back and still have some cash left over perhaps? (or at least dilute less in the future?)

TG