Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kurt R. who wrote (13954)	7/2/1998 8:15:00 AM
From: mark silvers	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

Kurt You are smart enough to realize that NO jr mining firm gives firm scheduling assumptions to the public regarding exploration/assaying. Due to the nature of that business, with it's inherent delays and unpredictable nature, no firm wants to hamstring itself in that fashion. When one does, you end up like IPM, with it's famous, chickens coming home to roost fiasco. That is why it is always left somewhat open-ended. Personally I have no problem with that, as it is the nature of the business. Also, in regards to the PP, unless there is something different about this PP, the norm is that you DO have to file to have the legends removed. I dont think there is anything different about this one, but I am not sure. If you know why this is different, please say so, as I own some of that PP, and will end up filing myself at some point. When you see that one, you can be SURE that is not my intention to sell, as I am very content with my investment at this point. Mark