Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ANALYST10 who wrote (16705)	7/2/1998 9:42:00 AM
From: MARK BARGER	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

right a-10 no interest in DGVI today. Probably will trade about 30,000 shares today. No interest at all. Mark

To: ANALYST10 who wrote (16705)	7/2/1998 9:46:00 AM
From: RocketMan	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 50264

>>One trade at 3:09 this afternoon for 168,500 shares which accounted for most of the days volume.<< A10, since that was your statement, would you tell us where your information came from? And if this trade really happened? And if it didn't, why did you say that it did?

To: ANALYST10 who wrote (16705)	7/2/1998 10:23:00 AM
From: RocketMan	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 50264

Analyst10, I am giving you the benefit of the doubt. Since you said that yesterday's volume was accounted for by a single 168k block at 3:09PM, I assume you had a reason for stating that. That trade does not show up on the trading log, nor on the Yahoo chart. Since you are an insider, I would like to know where you got that info, and how you know that trade took place and accounted for the volume. If you are privy to trading data that we average investors do not have, would you tell us why you have access to such data? And would you tell us how we can verify that 168k block trade at 3:09PM took place? I would like to verify that for myself. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt, and if you are correct I will give you credit for knowing that.