Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: macker who wrote (16754)	7/2/1998 12:31:00 PM
From: RocketMan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50264

I just checked with Rico, he says he sees those trades and did no see that one go by. Now, Analyst10 claims that this 168k block trade at 3:09PM yesterday accounted for most of the volume, used that to claim that DGIV's price was soft and would go down today. He claimed that a 168k block trade should have brought the price higher, but it didn't. He asked us to confirm this with our brokers. We have confirmed it, and so far we have found out that there was no such trade, at best it was canceled. OK, Analyst10, now I am really confused. Your claim does not see correct, as justification for DGIV's price action or anything else. Now I am beginning to wonder what other of your claims may be soft.