SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (356)7/2/1998 1:34:00 PM
From: Vanni Resta  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10072
 
Jack,

No, that is "Vanni speak" for: Grow up and stop being such a child, and stop pulling selective posts out to distort the truth. I have told the truth and never lied.

It is you who is trying to distort the truth, for whatever reason you think this is an interesting way to spend your time.

Once again, please stop abusing SI by using it to launch infantile off topic personal attacks.

Happy Investing!

Vanni



To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (356)7/2/1998 3:10:00 PM
From: David S.  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 10072
 
Jock, I repeat my statement of last night declaring Rock-the-Crock
and Vanni-the-Fat-Fanni are both one and the same. Neither of them has
denied my statement and Vanni sauntered that I was attacking her/his
homosexuality, whatever that might mean. So you for one should not go
on bantering with this Fish-Face and do exactly what you set up this
thread for, to avoid the Rock-Brain-in-the-Butt mentality that we had
to put up with on the main thread. If you don't agree with me say so,
and you can go on buttering the butt of this freako alter ego or
whatever it is (Slime-Man-From-Mars perhaps). But otherwise,
follow your own prescription about Rockie-Tock and just ignore Vammi-
the-Mammie. Regards, David S.

To: Dwight Griffin (317 )
From: David S.
Wednesday, Jul 1 1998 8:07PM ET
Reply # of 365

Dwight and Jock, Last week about 200 posts ago I was pessimistic about
the prospects for this Thread without Rocky for it seemed to me Rock-
the-Lock-Head had formed another persona and was talking with himself
on this thread and inviting Rock-the-Shock-Jock to post all he wanted
here. No one except perhaps Robert Read has picked up on this. What
I was suggesting was that Vanni Resta and Rocky are one and the
same and that they are constantly supporting one another in their
negative views of IOM. Now it appears that Jock has brought up old
posts of Vanni Resta suggesting he was gay and goofy long ago and
Vanni has at least owned up to being from New York city, Rock-the-
Spock-Focks home town. So someone with some SI or computer brains can
figure this out if I am right or wrong. In either case the two of
them are nuts and if they are one and the same, they are double nuts,
if you know what I mean. So have fun, you aren't free yet. Look at
posts 110, and the latest 311, 312, 314, 315, 317. A ROCK by any other
name is still a rock. My suspicion it that this nut case spends his
whole life on various threads getting his thrills from revving up the
crowd, a narcissism common to certain types that search for fame even
in the absence of talent.

Regards, David S.
Long on INTC, IOM, WCOM, LU



To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (356)7/7/1998 12:17:00 PM
From: Thomas L Nielsen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10072
 
Thank you Jock and also the other posters that campaigned to create an Iomega thread that was more newsworthy and less tainted with lies. Without the shills the information presented here can be weighted more fairly.
It is too bad that RR got so wound up with his vendetta that his bearish posts, however true, carried very little weight with me. His posts, carried out with integrity and without overstatements would have been welcomed and would have added important information to this thread.

Thanks again Jock, Tom



To: Jock Hutchinson who wrote (356)7/8/1998 11:35:00 AM
From: Vanni Resta  Respond to of 10072
 
Hey Jock,

No hard feelings, aye? After all, we are all here to share our knowedge about stocks and make money.

Along those lines, let me ask you a question. As you know, Iomega seems to have worked out its copyright problems with Nomai. But there was a full trail scheduled for April 1999 to consider all the patent and copyright issues.

You have been exposed to lawyers, so you know how they think. Do you think Iomega will continue to pursue these issues in court? Or will there be more settlements?

Happy Investing!

Vanni

bond.net