Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : IMNR - Immune Response -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AHM who wrote (758)	7/2/1998 2:07:00 PM
From: Robert Knight	Respond to of 1510

No that is not what I have said. For the sake of not belaboring a point, I wish you well with your investment in IMNR..... Robert

To: AHM who wrote (758)	7/2/1998 6:27:00 PM
From: AHM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1510

IT'S NICE TO FIND CONFIRMATION FROM A CREDIBLE SOURCE of what I have been posting today which has been subjected to much criticism from those who are looking for market makers to blame when it is the market that is acting normally. The following is excerpted from an IMNR posting on Yahoo (Message #2295 for full text and source): QUOTE: I also question the fact that the market makers are short hundreds of thousands of shares. They don't have that kind of capital. A trader can lose his job by being on the wrong side with too many shares. I think a lot of us are looking for someone to blame, and the market makers are an easy target. I hate to defend them, because I personally wouldn't trust them as far as I can throw them. But they tend to trade on the basis of the orders they receive. They are not going to go out on the limb with the firm's capital too far. I worked in a trading room of a small OTC firm a number of years ago, and they played it pretty close to the vest. Even when they wanted stocks to go up, they wouldn't throw themselves on a land mine. They don't want to be out of a job. END QUOTE Enough said!!