Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Market Gems:Stocks w/Strong Earnings and High Tech. Rank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lee Walsh who wrote (10957)	7/2/1998 4:59:00 PM
From: Oeconomicus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

Well, Lee, that company may be "fully reporting", but you aren't. Was it simply an oversight that you didn't share the name of the company? Or, is this like the boiler room broker that speaks in a low voice then stops, saying "let me go close the door" (of course, there is no door) before letting you in on his big secret? Bob

To: Lee Walsh who wrote (10957)	7/2/1998 5:10:00 PM
From: LastShadow	Respond to of 120523

ROFL "**** I ALSO KNOW SOME ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, THAT I DON'T WANT TO POST ON THIS BOARD, THAT WILL VIRTUALLY GUARANTEE YOUR SUCCESS IF YOU INVEST IN THIS COMPANY WITHIN THE NEXT WEEK." Talk about hype..if you can "virtually guarantee" it, and from the things you mentioned, that would qualify as insider trading by the SEC and you and whoever you share it with can have Miliken's old jail cell. I don't know about the rest of this thread, but I think I will force myself to stay away from that one. The only real shame is that I can't short it. Have a safe holiday gang, and rest up - next week will be a busy one. lastshadow

To: Lee Walsh who wrote (10957)	7/2/1998 5:37:00 PM
From: BelowTheCrowd	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

Lets see... You know a company, but you won't name it. Not only that, you won'e even say what kind of business they are in. The only thing you will say about them is that they have applied for listing on the NASDAQ, and that they CFO has been hyping the stock to brokers. You claim to have some mysterious information which you can't post here, which will guarantee good returns. The first three claims toghether qualify you as a hypster BS artist. The last one is either more BS or an unauthorized public disclosure of inside information. (When an insider says ANYTHING which indicates the direction the company may take, it is illegal. The fact that you have chosen not to provide the specifics doesn't matter. This presuming that you really have access to non-public information and that it's not really just more BS.) The whole thing sounds like a boiler room. Trying to suck people in. If you have something substantial to say, come back. mg

To: Lee Walsh who wrote (10957)	7/6/1998 9:58:00 AM
From: Greg Jung	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 120523

Are you the "stock of the month guy??" or same stock every two weeks? "I know about a company ... " exchange2000.com for convenience, an excerpt: I know about a company that is 2 days away from making it to the NASDAQ small cap market.....and off the BB.....they have already met the 22 day qualifying period of over $4....but the stock dipped slightly below $4 ($3.875) this week, because of a MM short (PILL) and the NASDAQ would like see them close at or above $4 bid on Monday..(it did close at $4 Friday)....The stock is thinly traded on the BB, with a float of only about 1.5 million.....They are profitable and expanding......The COO/CFO has been talking to and lining up fund managers and brokers for the last 6 months in anticipation of making it to the NASDAQ, and they have a lot of support when they get there, but the funds cannot buy until they are off the BB.....They are very confident that the stock will be at $5 to $6 minimum, and marginable, within a week or 2 of getting on the NASDAQ.... .They are fully reporting, and just got a 3 million influx of capital to triple revenues.....