To: Rudy who wrote (7477 ) 7/4/1998 5:31:00 AM From: Jester Respond to of 8242
<LOL. Like everything else ignore the volume, the big block sales. And Mr. Jester comes and calls my post "ignorant" while he prescribes "ignorance" himself. ROTFL. He's very confused. Jester, do you know ostrichs? They bury their head into sand if a danger is present, leaving rest of their body out in the open. LOL. Enough said.> Rudy, Thank you for your excellent post. It didn't give me much to work with but stayed minimally within the rules so I will give it a go. By the way, just rolled in from a pretty darn good party, so tonight your LOL means 'Lots of Liquor'. But I'm not so think as you drunk I am. I will try my best. First of all, I hope you're not going to throw those missing insider shares at me. Diluting the float with them now before the media blitz and completion of phase 2 at these prices would be fool hardy. Would make the run up more difficult due to larger float, more susceptible to shorters and robs them of the opportunity to sell them off at a higher price during the promotion. Only reason to do that if the company is going down the tubes. Then, OK get something for them. Better than nothing. But of course that would make the lock-up of 40 million shares a monumentally stupid move, wouldn't it? No, no good on that one. MM's. No, not with blocks that size. Too obvious. Large position simulating the start of a run to get the others buying? Then selling off in large blocks before the stock price drops too much? Yeah, maybe. Kind of a stupid game for a .40 move. But for $1 move. Worth it. Maybe. For all you know, I'm doing it. Of course the others may start selling off as you buy and then the benefit is mitigated. But on a stagnant stock, not much risk involved. Who cares? Well, you do. I guess. But none of this represents any danger. Let's abandon Investing 101 and get to the meat of it. I didn't call you pompous because of your speculations about the stock. You can't come to this board and dictate the rules, then bash people for violating the very rules that you prescribe(your word). More on 'prescribe' in a minute. People may want to post their holding as a show of support. This is not offensive. You flamed someone badly for stating he will buy more if it drops below a certain level. Everybody sets a level in their own mind that they are comfortable buying at. It does not mean they expect anybody else to buy; necessarily. It means that they anticipate the stock will rise above that level in the future and they would like to accumulate more there. Why this offends you is beyond me. Your post to me is a joke. I never posted you but your post was addressed directly to me. So, let's get to that. We talked about the stock so let's move on. 'Prescribe' means to set down as a rule or policy or to order the use of. Did I recommend ignorance as a policy? No, if I was being ignorant I was not prescribing it I was just exhibiting it. I think you meant 'exhibits'. If this post is to me who are you talking to in the second and third sentences? Yourself or your ostrich? 'Do I know ostrichs?' Not personally, do you know any? Maybe you meant 'Do I know about ostriches?' By the way the plural of ostrich is ostrich or ostriches. And if you are going to use the plural then you have to say 'their heads into sand' not 'their head'. 'Enough said' was the best part of your post. Maybe English isn't your strong suit, but it is very difficult for me to take you seriously when your post is riddled with spelling, syntax, and grammatical errors. Stick to structures. Try to be a little more ductile and less brittle. That way when you fail under stress, you will shear off smooth instead of jagged. Fireworks tomorrow. LOL. Lots of liquor.......again. djb