Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: 246810 who wrote (1140)	7/3/1998 12:07:00 PM
From: John Finley	Respond to of 3383

246810, Re: "Those who try to do a responsible job of analyzing an issue and then take great umbrage at being insulted and villified by IMO a gang of puppets who can't defend their product and only attack the analysts on a personal level while making no attempt to answer the honest questions put to them." I wouldn't take it personally. It's just electronic impulses in the ether <g>. I'm sure you understand what is really going on. It IS too bad that someone who actually knows something about this particular engine doesn't post. The engine does look interesting, reminds me of an old wobble-plate airconditioning compressor I took apart many moons ago. Maybe after all this BS dies down there will be something left over of value?? Until then e caveat emptor. Back to the woodwork until the smoke clears. JF

To: 246810 who wrote (1140)	7/3/1998 4:24:00 PM
From: david travis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3383

Char, my previous post covers a lot of this. However you call yourself an analyst. The real question is why have you never analyzed the source of so much misinformation. There have been more lies put up here by Goldy that have been proven to be lies. But you have never questioned OR commented about one. Not only that even though you know he has lied time and time again you are perfectly willing to take his next lie and run with it. Why is that? Where is the analysis there? This is a very pompus response you put here to John. Now tell us the truth.