Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill Jackson who wrote (33901)	7/3/1998 11:27:00 PM
From: Time Traveler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573930

Question: Who ever said the LM158 was designed for the defense industry? You, Bill Jackson, did. Check out your post: Message 5087969 "I [Bill Jackson] am aware of the LM123, 223, 323 [LM158, LM258, LM358] type of nomenclature reflecting parts for Mil, Ind or consumer uses with different temp and voltages ranges." So you believe mil-standard parts went through more rigorous testing but somehow refuses to believe Intel's 300 MHz parts went through more selective testing than the 266MHz ones. Do you believe in AMD's K6/300 and K6/266 having two different products? Please try not to be a hypocrite when answering this question. Time Traveler