Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Identix (IDNX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: brad greene who wrote (9088)	7/3/1998 10:01:00 AM
From: g.w. barnard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26039

bg, great post, i am running the numbers again, as i have done so many times only to be thwarted by extordinary charges or some other accounting irregularity (legal costs) which prohibits bottom line profits. maybe this time will be different??? i suspect it will. i remember using 1st qtr numbers including cal 28 tps, ins 48 tps, new joursey 8 tps, conavi 100 touchlocks, etc. etc. only to be let down by randy's failure to capitalize. i do have a sneaky suspision this time is different, i do not believe we will see furthur considation due to legal matters or lost contracts and am hoping a one time right off due to asian concerns is not in works. so i will be working on the numbers again (of course after the traditional barbie and brew). as to shorts, i have to go back look at the float, days to cover etc to determine if a true squeeze could take place (i don't recall that being imminent). happy 4th all (we have finally paid our taxes off and are beginning to work for ourselves 2nd half of this yr. according to ibd article). ye ha!!!! gw