Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Westell WSTL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: DR.TECH who wrote (11901)	7/3/1998 4:38:00 PM
From: Zephod	Respond to of 21342

>>they would tell you that if companies would have known that DMT chips would still not be commer. available at this time that WSTL would have received many more contracts for CAP<< Doc; I don't know what MOT has been telling the analyst, but the press and trade periodicals were made to sound like CG should have been out over a year ago. I wonder where the mis-information came from, Telechoice, industry analysts...seems to me it must have originated with MOT. It's a shame this was done to Westell, in retrospect most everything they did was right including their leaning toward CAP. Here we are in mid-98 and still no DMT, Westell's had a working product for years. The consultants & analysts are the ones responsible for Westell's predicament, if they had been right with the chip availability info Westell could have 10X the business they have now. >>Analyst have disappeared due to inst. that were buried in WSTL twice These guys really missed the ball and screwed Westell & the Penny family in the process. >>WSTL expertise to large companies makes them valuable ...WSTL is absolutely a DSL company that can deliver on promises to vendors<<. You would hope because of that whoever makes a play will give them a good price, sounds to me like they're negotiating out of a position of strength (despite the current market valuation).

To: DR.TECH who wrote (11901)	7/13/1998 9:25:00 PM
From: Skiawal	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 21342

Dr....I unfortunately have to assume that your information is absolutely UNtrue. At this point, I ASSume (hope) that it is beyond your control but if there were truly "3 suitors", heck even just one "suitor" the stock would NOT be going down . NO VOLUME all of last week sure doesn't spell "suitor"? . I have said this before and I will say it again...I don't think the analysts are as dumb as EVERYONE says they are. They sure seem to have been right back when the stock was at 20, 17, 14, 11, and even $9/shr. As a matter of fact, the only ones who have been right has been the analysts and "yousucklosers" over at Yahoo. As you have no problem providing us with information that is VERY encouraging it has been all sizzle and no steak...not even worthy of dog food. Unfortunately, I am LONG till the end (which is becoming sooner rather than later) and I only hope that "yousucklosers" can provide us with information that would support a long position...one day soon! And that will happen like it will snow in NY tomorrow! $5 does look more likely than $20...heck again $10!!!! Does "yousucklosers" = G.S.?????????????