Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: david travis who wrote (1148)	7/3/1998 4:39:00 PM
From: Lonnie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Mr. Travis you state that 246810 lied about there being no patent. I believe it was Greg who said there was no patent. You also, in your last post, said this: "A liar puts up a vague statement and you want the company to respond." Are you one of the MM's of this company, or do you consider yourself to be a part of the company as your post suggests? As Greg pointed out very early on this thread, you started AENG and then said you were a busy guy and stepped aside for Mr. Bailey to take over. As Greg posted 'You can be sure the SEC knows about this' Have you in fact stepped aside or are you a director of this company? As usual, I don't really expect an answer from you, but oh well....

To: david travis who wrote (1148)	7/3/1998 4:55:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 3383

Would you care to explain in detail the reasons for your Nasdaq fine and suspension? I assume everyone here knows about this, but if not, see #reply-4908090 Just a highlight: Patterson, Travis, Inc. (New York, New York) and David T. Travis (Registered Principal, Englewood, Colorado) submitted an Offer of Settlement pursuant to which they were censured, and fined $35,000, jointly and severally. Travis was suspended from association with any NASD member in any principal capacity for 20 business days, and the firm was suspended from participation in any initial public offering of any security meeting the definition of "penny stock" for one year. Again: explanations? Why, given this, should anyone believe a word you say?

To: david travis who wrote (1148)	7/3/1998 5:35:00 PM
From: Sir Auric Goldfinger	Respond to of 3383

"As for the patent, the AENG web page clearly points out the situation". Nein, TRAV das ist nicht richtig. You are dodging the question. The page says nothing clearly, and I have pointed out the duplicitous wording many times. That page will be part of the SEC case with respect to "false & misleading statements". You know damn well that AENG has no US patent and that that letter refers to the Australian patent. You are majorly dodging and everyone can see it. Gerg? Is that the sound of you tossing back another Mickelob? "Notification of approval has been received for the patent of the OX2 Engine from the United States Department of Commerce Patent and Trademark Office. As soon as the Patent Numbers is received they will be published for review." AENG's website quote and related URL: oxtwo.com Andrews' response #1147: To: +cornbread (1141 ) From: +Andrew Friday, Jul 3 1998 2:43PM ET Reply # of 1154 <Being a typical Gov. agency the response was convoluted but from the folks I spoke with it sounded like 6 to 9 month is typical. Once the patent number are issued it will probably be 6 month before the PTO data base is updated to include these numbers. < Generally they do take about 6 months to grant a patent, but the patent number and abstract are published on the day granted (always a Tuesday), usually by mid afternoon. You can search the US Patent Office database at: patents.uspto.gov " Message 5093437 (Our analysis) Another farce exposed and no meaningful response from anybody. Next, TRAV.

To: david travis who wrote (1148)	7/4/1998 4:39:00 AM
From: 246810	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3383

Having just absorbed the last 36 posts, I now realize it is too late to make a meaningful response to your post to me, but, david, I'll try. THESE WERE THE QUESTIONS TO GREG: "Why did we find out about the 1,000,000 share dilution to Shelby via the back door. Why did you promise patents in post (0) and not feel shock, outrage and embarrassment when the company can't produce them as you promised. Since you asked us not to bother Shelby, why don't you call him and ask him about the automobile trials and give us the facts instead of letting other people snipe at each other about it. As for the patents, forget the question. Everyone knows the answer. As for John, stop linking me to him. My spouse is getting suspicious. <g> As for Charlene and Char, please don't call me those, neither are my name. YOU POSTED TO ME: I have stated before why is it those claiming to seek information have never questioned the source of misinformation? Have repeatedly accepted lies and carried on as if they were true. An example is what Goldy recently put up about a canceled demo and 1,000,000 shares to Shelby. Both are lies to my knowledge. I have not seen anything reported by AENG on either matter. But yet one individual took those lies and made them facts. Then put out questions regarding both items. Not once was the source questioned. Why do you think? You are really a very obtuse man. 1) FACT: You david, say the statements about the 1,000,000 shares and the upcoming automobile-engine test delay are lies. 2) FACT: You, david, think it is reasonable for a person wishing to confirm what you know to be a lie to go to the source of the lie instead of the company source for verification. QED: Everyone knows, david, this thread does not deal in logic, but your position is the most illogical I can imagine. Get a grip. In my opinion, you are in vertigo from the hyperbole. Hopefully, the company is the source of information to confirm or deny the statements I was questioning. Since Greg seems to know everything about the company operations, I asked him not you, for a response. Since you knew they were lies, why didn't you just tell Greg to tell me they were lies? So simple, so straight forward. Or, was there some other agenda that kept you from revealing they were lies until later? Huh? In my opinion this appears to be some sort of conspiracy within the conspiracy. 246810