SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Daniel Liberty who wrote (28468)7/3/1998 9:43:00 PM
From: S.C. Barnard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Can someone just rip my fingernails out and let me get out even?<g>



To: Daniel Liberty who wrote (28468)7/3/1998 10:22:00 PM
From: FR1  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 97611
 
Notice earlier in this thread where in the interview with CPQ, the exec said he was not allowed to talk but they would do what they said they would do (ie hit at least zero).

This will be a good test for CPQ. They have been around a long time, they know the earnings game well and they have a lot of numbers to play with. The investors are demanding some kind of cheerleader performance. They better deliver.

I wish they would spin AltaVista off.
I have been listening to AltaVista commercials.
They are Horrible.
Made by some stuffed shirt with no clue.

Question: Which domain name is easier for you to remember and spell:

infoseek

yhoo

AltaVista

Not only is it a bad domain name to have, but the commercials ask you to remember and type in:

www.altavista.digital.com

or maybe it was:

www.digital.altavista.com

I can't remember

- PLEEEZZZEEE!!! - SOMEBODY FIRE THE GUYS IN CHARGE OF THIS STUFF! SOMEBODY HIRE A AD AGENCY THAT KNOWS WHAT TO DO!!!

I am afraid we are starting to get knee deep in what kills many big corporations - layers of incompetent managers so thick that even the super obvious does not get attention.



To: Daniel Liberty who wrote (28468)7/4/1998 10:34:00 AM
From: Pruguy  Respond to of 97611
 
If you want to put a lot of weight on the whisper number, than you don't really care what the actual WHISPER is. What you care about is the actual number and its relation to the whisper. In cpq's case, if whisper is they loose .07, then if they do any better than that it will be construed as a positive. The whole iddea of whisper is based on the difference between the published(conservative) numbers that analysts publish and what their real thoughts are.