SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Cytotekk who wrote (4428)7/4/1998 1:37:00 AM
From: s martin  Respond to of 6528
 
Another blow to your accuracy rating, you've posted how many more messages on this topic since Wed. ?

<<Good night, this is closed topic as far as I am concerned.

Cytotekk >>>>>

To: +s martin (4290 )
From: +Cytotekk Wednesday, Jul 1 1998 1:31AM ET
Reply # of 4429

I am not saying that the post was changed after the edit time allowed. But I too have edited just at the 14 minute point and posted a correction to one of my LITTLE MESSAGES beyond the 15 minute window.
As I have said, only a few people could have seen the original post since there are very few minutes in which to view before edit limits are imposed.

When Pugs posted that he had called Raabe and said Tonto never spoke to him, I was taken aback. So, I went back to Tontos post. It read quite differently, didnt flow, had missing words and disjointed quotation marks.
Did I mention that I used to get a As in my writing classes in college.
Poor writing offends me and I always take note of errors in writing.

In the original post grammer and sentence structure was correct for a 1st person account. The second time I read it there were missing pieces to the sentence, leaving what are known as sentence fragments, FYI, with 1st person quotation marks around them. I always look for who is being quoted when I read anything and take note. I first time it was Tonto quoting. The second time is was no one, just free standing quotes.

S Martin I am weary of this tedious exchange that can only be resolved by direct evidence, a copy of the original post.

Since that does not exist at this point, we will have to render judgement based on circumstantial evidence. Since you seem to think that we were all hallucinating, there is not point to our exchanges any further.

You have plenty of people to battle with here, I will not be one of them.

If we are all wrong, prove it.

Good night, this is closed topic as far as I am concerned.

Cytotekk