SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Craig Freeman who wrote (3466)7/4/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: TimC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Good Morning,

I just couldn't resist any more. I've been reading the posts on Sandisk for about a year and just had to jump in now. Much of what I have read makes sense and is very interesting. But recently, I think emotions are speaking, not reason or logic.

I am not, by any stretch of the imagination, an expert in the stock market. My teen age son convinced me to invest a year ago and now I have the bug.

Like some that post here I have, on paper, lost significantly on Sandisk. I bought and sold several times. My latest buy in was $23 and $19. See how much I know.

The whole scenario ( Sandisk ) just doesn't make sense to me. Here are some of my observations and questions:

1. Within the last 4 months Sandisk has hired two experienced men as additions to their senior management staff. Ken Edoff ( VP Sales Americas ) & Yoram Cedar ( VP Systems Engineering ). If business were going south, why would the company "staff up"? If this were not a growth opportunity, why would these two men join? Look at their backgrounds, they are not new to the business.

2. If I am reading the First Call correctly, Sandisk was up +89% (EPS) in the first quarter this year as compared to last year. For the second quarter this year, they are estimating a drop of 73% as compared to the second quarter last year. This is a huge swing. What major event happened? The only thing I can think of is a write down of some sort. Maybe inventory? If this were the case ( a one time write down ) wouldn't that make the rest of the year much more profitable (as they sold off this inventory at lower cost of goods)?

3. In regards to insider manipulation, I seriously doubt it. There are about 9 to 10 million shares owned by the select few. Of these only 84,000 were sold off during the last 6 months ( not even 1% of total ). During this period the stock went up to $25+ and down to $13+. If you were Eli Harari, sitting on over 1 million shares and knew something was fundamentally wrong, would you wait around to see your net worth drop by over $12,000,000 ???????

These are just a few of my observations. I'll wait to see if anyone has any answers or rebuttal to the above.

The only fact I know for sure is that the whole Stock Market is irrational most all the time.

"Sell on good news, buy on bad"

Figure this one out.......



To: Craig Freeman who wrote (3466)7/5/1998 4:19:00 PM
From: limtex  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 60323
 
Craig -

Why do I recall the reason given being the construction of a "mill" or "foundry" or some word like it to make wafers as required and cheaper than could be bought from third party suppliers?

L