Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : DGIV-A-HOLICS...FAMILY CHIT CHAT ONLY!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: dgivinvestor who wrote (17029)	7/4/1998 12:09:00 AM
From: Secret_Agent_Man	Respond to of 50264

Well said, nice to see your comments, this post and the one that followed. Thank you. r1

To: dgivinvestor who wrote (17029)	7/4/1998 7:05:00 AM
From: RocketMan	Respond to of 50264

Excellent post, dgivinvestor! We clearly have had our disagreements in the past, but there is nothing I can disagree with you on this post. Very well said!

To: dgivinvestor who wrote (17029)	7/4/1998 11:45:00 AM
From: ANALYST10	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50264

Well, your response shows your naivity of the market and responsibility of a public company. A company who has failed to receive a major material commitment should be responsible enough to notify the public so when they make an investment decision all the facts are there. I won't even argue the merits with you, since you clearly are unknowledgeable of what a company's responsibilities are. Public companies that are going to fall short of earnings notify the public all the time. I won't even bother debating with you, since I know nothing and you seem to know what the public disclosure rules are, the Exchange requirements and listing, 10SB requirements, FASBE guidelines, 12g filing requirements, and all those other goodies that are just buzz words i seemed to have picked up. Its curious though that a non reporting company reports only the good information and leaves out the material facts from them and doesn't report "significant news" that has an adverse effect on the company. These violate provisions of 27A under the securities act of 1933, as amended and section 21E of the 34 act, but those also are just some numbers and letters that I picked up along the way from pros like you. Yes these are real people on this thread, with real dollars that need to know the truths and not hype. When facts are negative instead of defending the company with facts, you ask about motives, shorts, who you work for. I feel sorry for the people who "claim" they have invested big $$$$ but are unable to verify the facts completely. Ask any investment professional in the world about what these people are doing and see what they say. So when your broker at whatever firm tells you that you are out of your mind, then he becomes a short also, or he knows nothing about the market. God bless you.