SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : AREE - Formerly TVSI -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DJ Byrne who wrote (4431)7/4/1998 8:11:00 AM
From: TideGlider  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6528
 
I posted this on RMIL, however it applies here also.

Anyone: I don't exactly know how I could help the SEC in the GNRO case. Don't
really follow it. Seen it here a few times.

I really don't think it is appropriate Ron Reese to respond to the matter, if he has been
charged.

To answer your question I would assist the SEC in any matter that they requested.
However, in the particular matter of Ron Reece, I don't know anything about him
accepting what has been written on this thread and the TVSI thread. I don't know how I
could be of assistance.

Folks should be certain that any dark shadows cast upon that company (GNRO) do in
no way vindicate that activities of OVIS/RMIL management.

I say this for a very important reason. Shareholders with one foot already in a trap have
been asked to step blindly on another spot in order to free themselves. It could be solid
ground or it could be another trap nicely covered with leaves and grass. Folks should
maintain their focus.

This may come as a surprise to some, but I ignore much of what is written here, Yay
and Nay alike. Can't possibly take it all in. So very little is written of substance that it
would be a waste memory to commit all of it.

Most of the thousands of posts can be separated into several categories.

1. Small % of facts about the company from company or posters.
2. Large % of people (Yay & Nay) yelling.."Good Post"...."High Five"
3. Larger % of people saying something stupid and the rest laughing.
4. Slightly smaller % agreeing with the stupid statement.
5. Large % of abrupt subject changes and distractions.
6. Huge % of assignment of motives of threaders by other threaders.
7. Relentless attacks of individual posts and posters that make up the majority of the
postings.
8. Numerous posts of "real or fiction" scenarios of what the company might do.
9. I'm telling Jill posts...(really they must have an aversion to this thread by now)
10.A constant flow of curiosity seekers that have no idea what is going on here
<VBG>.
11. Posts stating Due Diligence be done and that it only need be to call the company.
12. Posts stating DD means more than calling the company.
13. Posts warning people not to do DD and that it could ruin the companies plans.

These are 13 lucky reasons that this thread is dysfunctional. It does provide
entertainment and at rare times education.

I pity the SEC investigators that would have to sift through this thread or the TVSI
thread. My trading records would be made available for the asking by any agency. I
have never purchased or encouraged the purchase of any BB stock, nor do I know
anyone that has done so or anyone that has taken a short position on a BB stock is
engaged in defaming a stock for the purpose of personal gain, directly or indirectly.

I can think of nobody on this thread on a regular basis that has not engaged in petty,
undignified or unnecessary insults (myself included).

Regards

TG



To: DJ Byrne who wrote (4431)7/5/1998 11:28:00 PM
From: TopCat  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 6528
 
>>>When you nays speak, we know where it comes from.<<<

DJ,

By posting that to me, you only prove to me that you don't have the slightest idea what you are talking about.

TC