SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : SANGUINE CORP. (SGNC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mr. Forthright who wrote (2511)7/4/1998 1:40:00 PM
From: dwlima  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 5402
 
I wrote that i have never seen a valuation that discounts future earnings. This is true, but misleading.

I have seen many different ways (some complex and some simple) of valuing a company....after all any set of numbers can be discounted or multiplied by some factor(s)....what i have never seen is a valuation of future earnings used on a final report to a company. I have worked in 2 of the Big 6 accouting firms and I have never used this approach. Why? Because net income is easily manipulated by companies- especially small companies that do not use well-known accoutants.

to say that valuing earnings is theoretically most correct is absolutely stupid in my humble opinion. i completely disagree with any author that would write that.

i have not worked in the biotech sector- but i still find it hard to believe that discounting earnings is a more accurate way of valuing a company that discounting the only thing that matter- CASH.

well, i am not a finanacial analyst- just a management consultant...and i spend my time implementing Activity-based costing systems, performance measurement systems, and providing economic-value added management tools. i have done a few corporate valuations and have seen others done....i have not seen a company rely principally on a DFE valuation....that is not to say it is not done or accepted in a given industry.

BUT, i do not see any way in which this way can outperform a DCF valuation. i am open to proof....and the comments of an author does not do it for me.