SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Voice-on-the-net (VON), VoIP, Internet (IP) Telephony -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (898)7/6/1998 11:52:00 AM
From: Bernard Levy  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3178
 
Hi Frank:

I think that once local markets are truly competitive,
RBOCS should be allowed in the long distance business.
The Telephone Act of 1996 does not allow any RBOC
to purchase the likes of QWST, LVLT, IIXC right now,
since the FCC does not think (correctly in my opinion)
that the RBOCs have done enough to open their markets.
If you look at difficulties that RBOCs are placing
in the path of operators trying to rent space in
COs for placing xDSL equipment, I do not think you could
disagree.

In the long run, we will have a very interesting competitive
picture nationwide with multiple long distance plus
local networks cobbled with pieces of the pre-breakup ATT
plus a hodge-podge of wireless and cable companies.

Best regards,

Bernard Levy



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (898)7/6/1998 6:14:00 PM
From: Ray Jensen  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3178
 
Frank, to follow on
>>Why couldn't an RBOC attain rights into long distance by such an acquisition, like the rights of a foreigner who marries into citizenship...<<

As I mentioned a few weeks ago, this scenario has already presented itself with the proposed buyout of SNET in Conn. by SBC. SNET provides long distance to about 30% of its local access phone customers. As part of its buyout (if approved by regulators), SBC will "marry" itself to the SNET local and long distance business, although it probably could not expand long distance offering into the rest of its service area until regulatory approval occurs.
Ray.



To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (898)7/6/1998 6:36:00 PM
From: Bernard Levy  Respond to of 3178
 
Hi Frank:

The following article highlights the merits of IP
telephony even if access charges are assessed on these
calls.

techweb.com

Interesting to see it was written by an AT&T employee.

Best regards,

Bernard Levy