Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (7535)	7/5/1998 10:16:00 AM
From: Hugh	Respond to of 34075

Somebody obviously remembers Bre-X.

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (7535)	7/5/1998 10:16:00 AM
From: CIMA	Respond to of 34075

Tom, the $6.00 high you refer to occurred in an era when few of us were around. It was very shortlived and involved the previous management and a different property about four years ago. It is irrelevant IMO. The most logical benchmark would be the 96.25 cent high it achieved in 1997 following Guido's January 1997 report. I agree that big money won't be going into this until a third party is completed. The 8K will address this and we aren't far away.

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (7535)	7/5/1998 10:20:00 AM
From: zenin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

<Post 7241><<Mike, did you consider that there are lots of very nervous investors deciding whether to hold or dump on Tuesday? And lacking any report so far from GE, where else can they go?>> These where the comments from your post#7241 to which i was writing a replying, so so maybe you want to get some glasses re-adjusted and then take my comments as you will and don't ever assume that i might be one of the so-called nervous few that will be considering dumping my shares; i don't work that pal i know exactly what i am doing and i sure as hell don't need glasses. You do what you have to do with regards to this stock [if you hold any], but my position and comments where directed correctly. Jay