Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Loral Space & Communications -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neal davidson who wrote (3907)	7/5/1998 3:03:00 PM
From: dougjn	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10852

Personally, I think jlallen is getting to the point where he should, simply, be ostracized. A multitude of viewpoints is constructive and welcome. Even if some are occasionally irritating, so long as they are, at least from time to time, thought provoking or constructive. After waiting some while I have yet to read anything interesting, worthwhile or thought provoking by him. Or seen him gather useful and on point press or other information. On investment point, that is. I'm sure many of us occasionally irritate others on this thread. Which is all in a days cyber exploration. But jlallen not only seems to regularly and perhaps exclusively devote himself to political and personal attack; he also offers nothing useful or intelligent as even an occasional byproduct. That I've noticed, at any rate. Reading though random numbers of his posts on various forums (found by clicking on his name on the "From" line, for newbies) is quite instructive. His obnoxiousnes seems quite consistently, universally and liberally applied. Quite an individual! Accordingly, I suggest we all just turn our backs. Ignore him. Fail to respond to him. Ostracize. Or at any event, those that wish to argue with him (for some reason that escapes me), might repair to the Loral politics forum. Regardless that he persistently tries to bring that full bore to here. Doug

To: Neal davidson who wrote (3907)	7/5/1998 3:04:00 PM
From: jlallen	Respond to of 10852

If my response was "vague" it was only because you chose not to understand. Your assumption as stated by you was that I did not own Loral. Read your own post again. (I did.) As to whether one's response is "positive" or "negative" I suppose that is a matter of opinion. Finally, my "political diatribe" is not in fact a diatribe. Do you know what a diatribe is? Read the post again. It is far from a diatribe. I've asked a question which has yet to be answered and I have stated a number of facts. A diatribe that is not. JLA