Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Libertarian Discussion Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (475)	7/5/1998 5:22:00 PM
From: Just My Opinion	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 13060

MR T: It's not a series of essays on Liberty? What a jerk, that Mills was. He tricked me by using "On Liberty", as his title. Bummer. Thanks for setting me straight. Geeeze, I will never forgive that guy.

To: I Am John Galt who wrote (475)	7/5/1998 11:43:00 PM
From: MeDroogies	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 13060

Terms being what they are as a function of the times...progressive is meant to be LIMITED. Nobody here (I would be amazed if they did) wants to eliminate gov't. Limited gov't is generally what we are looking for....considerably more so than our current one. Lack of gov't leads to dissolution and eventual defeat. Anyone who has read a history of the Celts or the Hanseatic League realizes what the lack of discipline in sociopolitical formations leads to.... Still, that doesn't mean an active gov't is desirable.