Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Inflazyme Pharmaceuticals (T.IZP) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Harold Lehman who wrote (978)	7/5/1998 9:43:00 PM
From: Harold Lehman	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1501

I had written something before this post, but it didn't get on so I'll redo it. I spoke 2-3 weeks ago with Mr. Beath, asking him about what's going on with Cortecs and what are his plans for the company. He said that he was in favor of equal access of information to all shareholders at once so I asked him if us nonstitutional shareholders were getting the same information in the same timely fashion as Goldman Sachs and Rothchilds. He then gave me the lame excuse that since it was a telephone conversation and he really didn't know if I was who I said I was, an Inflazyme shareholder, that he couldn't say anything to me. I think that we need to camp out in Vancouver and frequently visit the company headquarters. Also, the company's Annual Shareholders' Meeting is in August, I don't know the date, but I'll find out tomorrow. I am not sure whether I'll be able to attend the meeting but will if able. My proxies have not been sent to me the last two years but I will be sure to do what's necessary to receive it in a timely fashion this year. I even suspect Salari of not sending them deliberately to the smaller shareholders. Then I will vote against everything on it as a protest to their wall of silence toward us noninstitutional shareholders. This won't change any agendas, but I think that it needs to be done for the record. If you agree with me I urge you to do the same. I don't believe that any other shareholders deserve company information in a more timely and more thorough fashion than any others (GS/Rothchilds and friends vs. the rest of us). This post was supposed to go before #978. HL