SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : The New QLogic (ANCR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Patrick A. Kelly who wrote (17018)7/6/1998 7:17:00 PM
From: Patrick Sharkey  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 29386
 
Thanks for the post, but I am concerned a bit about IBM having access to the technology developed by Ancor just because IBM is an owner of Ancor stock. There is no connection between the two unless the original purchase of Ancor stock by IBM so provided. . .so this aspect of the discussion with Mr. Nelson remains unclear to me. IBM should have to pay for the Ancor technology. . .if it wants it. . .just like anyone else, including me, as a stockholder.

Pat



To: Patrick A. Kelly who wrote (17018)7/6/1998 8:03:00 PM
From: janski  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 29386
 
Nelson wouldn't tell you anything even if there was anything of substance to be said. I think it is an insult that he and others
at Ancor continue to use the NDA excuse to cover the zero progress they have been making in the last two years. They have used this excuse over and over again and the final result had always been NOTHING of substance. It is insulting as it is more obvious every day
that for whatever reason: technical inadequacies of their technology,
inept management, useless sales people or a mix of all plus some, they
are losing/have lost all the major OEMs to be had. Poor guy is wondering why the stock price has fallen so much. Few months delay(or whatever) in FC is no excuse for not winning any future business or
no indication of winning some business in the future.