Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: knight who wrote (33240)	7/7/1998 7:32:00 AM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 35569

knight, check out what is going on with the Fiero Bros. The SEC et al. has got them by the short hairs. What where the MM connections with IPM activity. It should be checked out. Everyone that calls IPM a scam says that there aren't metals there. Well, I have heard from enough independent sources that there are metals, much greater than the "official assays". Even IPM's last report shows values greater than what Naxos is currently reporting. There is an issue of assay pretreatment for consistent results. Maxam has one key, GPGI another. AuRIC rolled over IPM and played with GPGI recently. I will agree that IPM management didn't have an ability to deal with the forces only interested in IPM's demise. Maybe the legal system does. I'm glad to hear that we may get the investigation necessary. Go get `em Ken Starr. <VBG>