Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : TAVA Technologies (TAVA-NASDAQ) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JDN who wrote (20045)	7/7/1998 9:43:00 AM
From: Mr. Pink	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 31646

TAVA HEADING FOR A 7 HANDLE !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Mr. Pink

To: JDN who wrote (20045)	7/7/1998 10:57:00 AM
From: Rick Bullotta	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

Do you know when (or if) an updated Emerald report is coming out?

To: JDN who wrote (20045)	7/7/1998 11:31:00 AM
From: biffpincus	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 31646

<<I have the updated Hannifen report right in front of me and Hannifen is calling for 4 cents this quarter 6/30.>> JDN, I think that is GREAT news.... that number is much more manageable.... and gives me greater confidence in TAVA meeting expectations and perhaps surpassing them .... biff

To: JDN who wrote (20045)	7/7/1998 11:42:00 AM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Respond to of 31646

Just to clarify the earnings estimates... There are two estimates out there for TAVA (though, oddly, only one recommendation). The low estimate is 4 cents which is presumably the Hannifen report. There is another estimate of 10 cents out there as well (the Emerald report?), which averages out to "consensus" 7 cents. Curiouser... even though the last quarter's two estimates vary by six cents (4-10), the full-year estimates differ by twelve cents (0-12). Someone either can't add or hasn't even updated their estimate to reflect established results. Then there's the FY99 projections. 37 cents... and $1.10! That just strikes me as totally out of scale... perhaps the latter fails to reflect a split?