Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FAMH - FIRAMADA Staffing Services -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brad who wrote (21573)	7/7/1998 11:44:00 AM
From: JOEY	Respond to of 27968

Brad I agree that the new management looks to be up front and professional BUT: We, the shareholders are taking a beating (mentally) as a direct result of prior management. FAMH executives MUST take it on the chin (where is he?) and show us some good faith by reducing the float via Arif's shares. I know its his company but we do own pieces of it. I feel we should demand accountability of the shares. Instead of posting our concerns on SI, I hope everyone here also directly tells management how we feel. I want those shares out of the float ASAP. If he does not intend to comply, I am out. I want him to address this issue. Enough is enough. FIRAMADA INC COM(FAMH) Bid: 0.16 Ask: 0.19 Last: 0.16 Change: -0.02 jake

To: Brad who wrote (21573)	7/7/1998 12:06:00 PM
From: dave brown	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 27968

A portion of the recent press release. "Firamada also issued a statement from the recently appointed Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer, Michael J. Sukey. Addressing the Company's financial status, Mr. Sukey said, ''Firamada has been profitable and continues to be so." How can current management say we are profitable and have been profitable, but give no black and white numbers to back up the comment? Isn't this the same thing previous management did? If they KNOW they are profitable, at least confident enough to say it in a PR, shouldn't they have numbers to generate this comment? Didn't they also say they were going to keep shareholders in the loop? Doesn't sound like it to me.