Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rillinois who wrote (5757)	7/8/1998 12:09:00 AM
From: mister topes	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 42834

For you to state your purpose is not to smear Brinker is a total farce. Your only purpose from day one has been to trash Brinker and you have done so at every opportunity. You even decided to ignore two of the greatest stock purchase recommendations of the decade that Brinker made in Marketimer for all subscribers to enjoy. You cannot deal with the fact Microsoft has risen 2700% and Vodafone 700% since 1990 and 1989 respectively and so you choose to ignore these great picks. Instead you harp on UTEK which can easily achieve the current $40 target in 1999 with a turnaround in the fundamentals of the industry. Everyone on this board knows what you are, and certainly knows you are not a twenty-something year old girl. But that is what you say you are because you play your little game of trash and burn. But all on this board know about you and know exactly who you are.

To: Rillinois who wrote (5757)	7/8/1998 2:35:00 PM
From: Diamond Jim	Respond to of 42834

Rillinois, RE: Don Lane's " But all on this board know about you and know exactly who you are." I don't know who you are, who are you ? You aren't Mr. Bowtie are you ? Maybe you are one of the bad news bears ? jim

To: Rillinois who wrote (5757)	7/9/1998 2:02:00 AM
From: Math Junkie	Respond to of 42834

Re: "Finally, I'm curious as to why you would ask me this question." I read your earlier post where you quoted the original UTEK recommendation, and I did see that you are right about it originally having been recommended as a 12 to 18 month trade. My question was partly to remind you that the 12 to 18 month period is not over yet, and thus it is a little early to be proclaiming defeat for Brinker on it, and it was partly to find out where you are coming from on this. UTEK is in an extremely volatile and hard-to-predict sector, and it comes as no surprise to anyone who knows the industry that Brinker (or anyone else for that matter) has more trouble forecasting its near term performance than he does with the market as a whole. I have a hard time understanding why you are making such a big deal out of a temporary setback for one of his stock picks, considering the fact that the original recommended holding period has not elapsed yet, not to mention the fact that he has lengthened his time frame on it.