Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pennygod who wrote (4852)	7/7/1998 8:37:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 7491

I don't doubt you're right. Add to that the fact that the stock had taken an awful beating, and was due for a bounce. But what's "Klaw Investments"? Does this have anything to do with Paws Only? Nobody's mentioned it here...

To: Pennygod who wrote (4852)	7/7/1998 8:44:00 PM
From: Intrepid1	Respond to of 7491

Hi Pennygod, Well if there are three newsletters hyping this stock then someone has wasted a bunch of money greasing the editors. This sudden price increase you speak of is pretty meagre considering all the hype behind this stock. But I do agree that the stock has bottomed out here and could climb back into the thirties or better with some "real" good news. best wishes purething

To: Pennygod who wrote (4852)	7/7/1998 11:33:00 PM
From: ISOMAN	Respond to of 7491

Technically, the Stocks$tomorrow newsletter came out after the price increase. After the press release by cashco, the price went up to 25 cents ask, and closed at the day end at 22 cents. Stocks4Tomorrow put out a blurb on it the next day, and all it really was, was a reprint of the press release, with shultz predicting a return to the 40 to 50 cent range. Basically, he was just being a me too.

To: Pennygod who wrote (4852)	7/8/1998 12:45:00 PM
From: TEDennis	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7491

Pennygod: I was curious about the trading history of this stock, so I checked out the 52 week track record. Low: 0.025500 Hi : 6.000000 Now: 0.180000 It's now 706% higher than its lowest value, but only 3% of its highest value. So, depending on your perspective (read: your buy-in point), this might have been a fabulous investment, or it might have been a disastrous foray into investing. If there's still anybody here who paid $0.0255 for this stock, I'd like to know what their price target is. Similarly, if anybody paid $6 for it, what is their price target? Any explanation of targets, or initial purchase reasons would be appreciated. Regards, TED