Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : General Magic -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jerry Miller who wrote (2690)	7/7/1998 11:03:00 PM
From: deepresearch	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10081

Hello SI! I really needed a break from the Yahoo board - its like Hell's kitchen over there. looking forward to a steady rise from here. Anyone think the Russell 2000 listing will help reduce the volatility? BTW, thank-you to SeaOtter and RayReub for the posts that helped me get into this stock back in April.

To: Jerry Miller who wrote (2690)	7/7/1998 11:32:00 PM
From: TechTrader42	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10081

Jerry: I suppose I feel that it still looks a bit iffy. I'm waiting for the price to close above the 21- and 9-day moving averages. It made an attempt today, but failed. Some indicators have turned up, including CCI and StochRSI. For non-techies, those are shorter-term indicators, but the fact that they're turning up is somewhat encouraging. Another encouraging sign is rising on balance volume, an indicator that compares volume to price change. MACD with shorter-term periods (5,35,4) is moving up -- again enouraging -- but has yet to rise above the signal line (one possible buy signal). The stock needs something to lift it out of the doldrums, to move it strongly up past 12. That's where I see it lingering, if it doesn't have a strong day. With some good days, it could move back up to 14.5, but if it came under pressure again, it could still drop back to support at 10 -- or lower. All of which means nothing, of course -- just some spechnical analysis (which could be just some dust on me spectacles). Brooke