Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : MIDL .... A Real Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ga Bard who wrote (2055)	7/8/1998 5:13:00 PM
From: Marshall W.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7039

Dear Gary: As you said in part in your # 2069:: "I am not an attorney_______". However Gary, you are the :"Lead Agency", the :"Publisher" on this MIDL Board. As such you have, in your ever faithful manner, unintentionally placed me in an embarrassment,. by bringing up the possibility of my suing the Liquidation Trust. My legal brief presented in #2049 lays out the legal basis/appeal to JOIN WITH----NOT SUE THE LIQUIDATION TRUST.. In legal circles, a brief would be passed around and examined for its merits. If judged valid by peers the brief would be expanded, modified, polished. The purpose of my brief was to GIVE HOPE AND ENCOURAGEMENT TO THOSE WHO SWITCH TO WARRANTS. 1. As you said Gary: "but I have been told numerous times today that when a shareholder sells they settle their complaint and thus have to make a case against said fraudulent person or persons". May I say: even though selling establishes a detachment there may still be valid grounds for recourse or participation through the Trust. 2. One major point of my brief is that the act of selling commons and buying warrants in an effort to salvage lost profits does not: DIVORCED ONE FROM THE INVESTMENT BUT ESTABLISHES A CONTINUITY . 3. As you may be aware, the Law cannot be specific in all areas. This is why we have determinations by the JUDGE. 4.. As well as an attorney knows a judge, he cannot always know the end result of an action.before that judge. Also some judges have poor knowledge of the law in depth. The attorney must have researched the laws, torts, histories, legal presidents before presenting his case and further arguement I should keep my experience to myself or restricted my brief to the non-family legal circles in which I am involved. What I say here will have little effect the Midland outcome. Best and thanks, Marshall W. Sorry to dwell on, and perhaps bore, on this legal-hope-point. I tried to post this earlier but it did not show up. This board is a great learning place as we join together at the MIDL watering hole. Some of us may be "all wet" at times but many a towel has been shared. I cannot express enough thanks and appreciation.. Also thanks to Mark? Pierce.