Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: the Chief who wrote (8741)	7/8/1998 2:54:00 PM
From: kevin	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

can anyone give me TT's email address please.

To: the Chief who wrote (8741)	7/8/1998 2:57:00 PM
From: ryson	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 34075

To All: I just got off the phone from Toronto, where I was told that there are 4 independent geo,s on site right now! 2 are representing institutions, one is there by a investor who likes the stock but wants his opinion and the last is the toronto geo. If they all have the same thought and the property looks good watch out. My feeling in its just the MM,s have fun and loading up. Ryson

To: the Chief who wrote (8741)	7/8/1998 3:02:00 PM
From: Patrick Lauder	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

<By all standards, the work he performed (number and locations of samples) is not supportive of the conclusions he advanced> How can you make this statement when you have never seen his 2500 page report. Also I assume the SEC did not find anything wrong with a similar report by Guido last year where similar figures were published but with no proven. Therefore we must assume the only problem is with the proven!!! In my humble opinion, with all the shafts, steep hillsides, deep trenches, history, etc... the amount of samples seems reasonable. Also, why is it a previous geologist was able to put 5 million inot the proven category, are we assuming his report which we have not seen is not correct. I am not sure but I would imagine the Newmont and Barrick Directors had a look at Guido's report. Are you saying their experience could not see what you see? Respectfully, Pat