Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bill who wrote (6982)	7/8/1998 8:56:00 PM
From: Bearcatbob	Respond to of 26850

bill, Over time many of us get to know each other for real outside of the public forum. As far a public anonymity, well, who knows what kind of nuts are out there? Some of these stocks are held very patiently by the loyal sufferers. Bob

To: bill who wrote (6982)	7/8/1998 10:14:00 PM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 26850

Be careful phalling in luv with a stock. What's your bias? Are they all good and the managers genii? Or are they all like Samuel Clemens said a hole in the ground with a promoter at the top? I favour the latter perspective. But I do it myself. So from my perspective I am a "promoter". Ask me. I have a diamond or gold mine on every claim. Actually given sufficient money I damn well could have. hmmmmmmm.. If CJ at SUF hadn't been so damn cheap he could have had Marsfontein. It's his fault. He offered the heirs 15 million. DeBeers offered them 15 million first. Chris would not budge. So what is that, 15 million lousy dollars for a one carat diamond mine worth probably 4 billion dollars that will run at 65 % profit? Good grief. Mr. Cheap. Mr. Stupid. Facts are he couldn't raise the bribe. Sad. It's a two bit business fooling itself that it is in search of treasure.