SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: put2rich who wrote (9578)7/8/1998 6:55:00 PM
From: Rob S.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
Good article. That's right, investors shouldn't be worried by a 50% drop from here. That is just more of a reason to buy at any price. The logic is irrefutable. Buy now and buy often and wait five to ten years and you'll be rich. Only cowards would sell the stock now.

Go Amazon.com!!!



To: put2rich who wrote (9578)7/8/1998 7:42:00 PM
From: umbro  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
That's a great article, but what did they say? The Fools are going
to hold AMZN for long term growth although it could easily
stay flat, or fall to 50% of its value over the next 3 years. They're
comparing AMZN to AOL and DELL, as a core holding, but I'm having
trouble with that analogy. I'd like to hear what people have to
say on this comparison. My take, is that the average sales price
of Dell's product is a heck of a lot higher, and the sales
channel more concentrated. On AOL, they bought the market early,
and still provide the easiest to use, flat-rate access to the
internet - and I think their revenue per customer is higher
than Amazon, and their support cost per customer in terms of
delivered product is a lot lower (no physical goods have to
be shipped).

the article: fnews.yahoo.com



To: put2rich who wrote (9578)7/9/1998 2:16:00 AM
From: zebraspot  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164684
 
>> Fischer and Gardner
plan to act as patient long-term business partners in the manner of a Warren Buffett.<< -from the Fool article

This is pure garbage.

Name a stock Buffett owns(or has ever owned) that has no earnings in sight and sells at 50(?) times sales? (I've lost track)

And, if Coke tripled in 3 weeks, you bet your ass he'd think long and hard about selling it. (If not, his shareholders should fire him)