Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Royal International Venture RIL.V (was Labrador Int'l LAB) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Roger D who wrote (956)	7/9/1998 8:42:00 AM
From: Winer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3380

Roger, I don't know whether you are a mouthpiece for the "concerned shareholders" or just a supporter. Either way, your last argument qualifies you for "used car salesman of dubious credibility" honours. Here is your argument: ____________________________________________________________________ Anyone know why the Company has not answered any of the charges of the "concerned stakeholder group" yet? The group put out their first news release last Monday, OVER A WEEK AGO!!!!! I haven't seen any real response from the Company yet. Why have'nt they said anything? What's the Company hiding? I'll bet they're silent because the group speaks the truth, and Bradley, Larabie and the rest of them all know it. _____________________________________________________________________ The problem I have with this is that you have erected a straw dummy in claiming that a response is crucial to the credibility of Labrador. It is quite possible that in the view of many shareholders a response is not necessarily warranted. So, I think you are creating a bandwagon for stray minds to associate themselves with. The meeting between Labrador and Donner yesterday, apparently arranged by the "concerned shareholders," is in my mind a sufficient response. In addition to its basis in a false premise, the insinuations found in your "bet" of the last sentence come without any evidence to support your suggestions. Perhaps we might arrange to have both Bradley and Larabie weighed in comparison with a local duck in order to determine their affiliation with witchcraft. In terms of this "bet" you seem to have a propensity to gamble. In this sense you are well matched with your interest in mineral exploration in "SVB."