Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (8883)	7/8/1998 10:58:00 PM
From: GC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

Like do you guys take shifts one leaves another one comes, the comments from SEC said it would take 5,000-10,000 samples now your up to 100,000.

To: Claude Cormier who wrote (8883)	7/9/1998 12:56:00 AM
From: toma	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

sampling precision (not really) i'm in the business of geochmical sampling and analysis and while we rely on numbers to prove a point, statistics provide for certain degree of "imprecision." beware of the big picture - that is, whether or not this is credible at all - but don't think that because the guy revises his numbers by less than a percent it is prescription for a falsified report. he could reanalyse the same data tomorrow using three different 3D geostatistical modelling packages and get three different numbers. BUT, if they are all within 10%, they would be great estimates. as i stated a couple of posts ago, we need to focus on the fundamental information. is this an area of great mineral potential...when will the "external" audit be completed...when will this Turner fellow come out some info? day traders, go ahead and keep playing your games...and chance that you will out of the market when (and if) good news hits... mac