Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lionel Hungar who wrote (14110)	7/9/1998 8:35:00 AM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Respond to of 20681

Mr Hungar, I see you are accusing me and others who disagree with Carl Campbell of being 'promoters' putting our welfare ahead of the honest shareholders of Naxos. Please explain this statement. Since I own shares in Naxos and have no interest in J/L or any other of the competing interests here please explain how my interests are benefited by anything other than what exactly benefits the Naxos shareholders as a group? Please explain how handing over a huge share of the company's equity to J/L is justifiable when they have yet to prove their process is patentable. How is this of benefit to the Naxos shareholders as a group? I have been very open about who I am and what my interests are. Many people on this board have spoken to me privately, including people such as SK Werom and John Allen, and know I am exactly who I say I am. Who are you? What is your agenda? What is your relationship to the various parties? Why do you chose an alias that echos the HungryLion poster that used to post here? Everyone who reads this board knows my agenda as I have fully disclosed it. What is yours?