Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Mike Gold who wrote (8959)	7/9/1998 8:44:00 AM
From: JS	Respond to of 34075

Is some one going to call Sabrina or Guy today? I would but won't be near my computer to be able to report to the thread. Seems they have a responsibility to attempt to settle everyone's nerves at this point. All of this confusion only gives more ammunition to the naysayers. Regards Joe

To: Mike Gold who wrote (8959)	7/9/1998 9:05:00 AM
From: Paul Denton	Respond to of 34075

To all : According to Dr Hausen (ex Chief of mineralogy for Newmont Mining), a technical adviser for MINE, who visited the property last September, he states : "This is a unique and unusual deposit". We've got Guido saying the same thing and coming up with astonishing numbers, but claims that he "just cannot change them". If this property is so "unique", but many geologists who gave their bad feelings about the whole claim through newspapers but never had the report in their hands nor have seen the geology characteristics and saying "there's just hasn't been enough work done", I guess that if GE hires a third party audit to go through Guido's report, they WILL have to go down to the site and look for themselves!! If you have to use "unique" methods (methods not commonly used in the business) to prove up the ounces, it's only by going down to MINE's mine site. It will not be very helpful having an audit saying the report is done in a proper manner. We need real facts!! And I guess that a "unique" world-class deposit with such claims has to be "unique" in it's geology (IMHO). Only my two cents worth, Best regards and hope for a better day, Paul in Geneva