SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : COMS & the Ghost of USRX w/ other STUFF -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: DMaA who wrote (16587)7/9/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: Moonray  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 22053
 
Man zapped with 50,000 volts for talking in court
Posted at 11:55 a.m. PDT Thursday, July 9, 1998

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - All he did was talk too much, but that was
enough for a judge in Los Angeles to order a defendant zapped with a
50,000-volt jolt of electricity, it was reported Thursday.

The Los Angeles Times said it was the first activation ever in Los
Angeles of a prisoner's electronic security belt.

Ronald Hawkins, defending himself at a sentencing hearing, continually
interrupted municipal Judge Joan Comparet-Cassani and so she ordered
the bailiff to use his remote control to administer an eight-second
electric shock, the paper said.

People in the courtroom said Hawkins grimaced and stiffened as the
electricity surged through his body. He was wearing the security belt,
which is known as a REACT belt, because he had acted violently while
in jail on two previous occasions.

But Deputy Public Defender Jacques Cain, who was present in court
waiting to represent another defendant when the incident occurred last
week, said he was shocked at the use of the belt for such a trivial
reason.

''If the guy was fighting with the bailiffs, I can understand using the belt
to restrain him, but that was absolutely not the case. To physically
punish a defendant for speaking out of turn seems ... outrageous,'' he
told the Times.

Comparet-Cassani was not available for comment Thursday. She told
the newspaper that a code of judicial ethics prevented her from
discussing the case while it was still pending.

The hearing was held over to July 29 after Hawkins, 48, said he needed
more time to recover from the jolt.

According to court transcripts the judge warned Hawkins she would
have him zapped. ''You are wearing a very bad instrument, and if you
want to feel it, you can, but stop interrupting me,'' she said.

''You are going to electrocute me for talking?'' Hawkins asked. ''No
sir, but they will zap you if you keep doing it,'' the judge replied.

After Hawkins had interrupted Comparet-Cassani twice more, the
judge told him: ''One more time, one more time, go ahead.''

''That is unconstitutional,'' Hawkins replied before the judge ordered he
receive the full 50,000-volt force of the law.

Hawkins was convicted of petty theft, a misdemeanor, but ashe had
two previous felony convictions he was eligible to be sentenced to a
much longer time in jail under California's ''three strikes'' law.

o~~~ O