Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Arcane Lore who wrote (9167)	7/9/1998 10:07:00 PM
From: Jim Bishop	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

A.L., you are one handy dude to have around and I hope you stay around. Printed your posts and heading for food, and will digest both at the same time. Speaking of time, you are also one great time saver for me. Question - holdin' any MINE? Thanks a lot, Jim, hungry in Vancouver, and love to learn.

To: Arcane Lore who wrote (9167)	7/9/1998 11:54:00 PM
From: Cytotekk	Respond to of 34075

Thank you Arcane, excellent post. eom - Colleen

To: Arcane Lore who wrote (9167)	7/10/1998 3:26:00 AM
From: Jim Bishop	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Sorry, but I still need more help if you are able. Section 10(b)(5), can you point me towards it? I was assuming that this was of the SEC Act of 1934. I can't find a section 10(b)(5)in it. Also what form would you suspect the amended formal complaint would take? SEC believes that the May 22 news release "may have been released without a sufficient basis as to the reliability of the report". I guess the disclaimer in the release that the findings are those of an independent contractor does not satisfy the SEC. Blame Guido won't work as the basis of a Wells Submission? If pinning it on Guido will not work, do you think that "between a rock and a hard place", squelching speculators, pressure from SI and other online investors, and fear of a security leak, would form the basis of a Wells Submission that could be bought by the SEC? It is novel, and as you found, a novel approach worked in another case. Doesn't sound like much of a legal position regarding the release, but it is novel, and I'll bet hasn't been tried before. Any ideas? Regards, Jim