Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Al C who wrote (14159)	7/9/1998 11:37:00 PM
From: Larry Macklin	Respond to of 20681

im tired and im going to bed but one quick word on AL C's post. I just spoke to lett minutes ago and payment has been made and russel will have the results tomorrow..he may write a preliminary report based on those results or he may wait for all 4 labs...regardless of the results, neither lett nor russell have any idea if j/l is economicly viable...lett wants to begin production at F/L immediatly, if the numbers are good. thank you Larry Macklin PS greg john has a good plan to get all of the playes in this to work together for a common goal, ask him about it.

To: Al C who wrote (14159)	7/10/1998 12:04:00 AM
From: KRosenfeld	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Mr. Al C, You seem to have a great deal of knowledge regarding the inner workings of Naxos, much more than I have. You also seemed to truly believe in supporting Mr. Campbell and his position. I would like to ask you a few simple questions, that will allow me to decide whether or not to take you and your arguments seriously. I am trying to figure out your agenda. You see, my agenda is simple, I want Naxos stock to go up. I want it to go up a lot. That is MY AGENDA, Now to the questions: 1. Who are you to have access to such intimate details of Naxos? I know who Henry Volquardsen, Mark Silvers, and Kim Brasington are. They provide names, E-mail addresses, and on request phone numbers so that I might contact them. Who are you, sir?, so that I might have a better way to judge your arguments. 2. Do you or Mr. Campbell have any financial interest in J/L? I would like to figure out your and Mr. Campbell's motives in solely supporting J/L when it appears to me that the conventional mining community wants Standard assays in determining the economic feasibility in mining Franklin Lakes. Why not use J/L as an enhancement later on when mining takes place to improve yield at that point? 3. If you have so much interest in Naxos, and realize the importance of this thread (as you obviously do from your sudden appearance), where have you been for the last year or so? Why should I trust you when you appear out of nowhere while others have painstakingly shared information with us over time and developed well earned trust? I look forward to your responses. Please allow me to forward more questions to you in the future as they come to mind. Sincerely yours, Ken Rosenfeld

To: Al C who wrote (14159)	7/10/1998 9:08:00 AM
From: absolutetruth	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 20681

AL You have some credibility problems, my friend. First you mention four labs, now it's two. Then you tell us that this Russell character has given the green light to the process. Now the story is he doesn't know yet, it's that he can't get paid. You came up with this version only after Larry flushed out the truth about the current status of the testing, revealing that you lied when you said that Russell had given J/L the green light. Now, after being caught in what appears to be a lie, you are asking us to believe you in spreading what appears to be inside information. Should we take you at your word? You have already been proven to be either mistaken or lying on other subjects, and you expect people to take your word on this? Tell us, why should we? You ask us to take Carl Campbell's word. He wrote a letter stating that Russell was giving the green light to the process. That was also wrong. He has no way of knowing that. Russell has stated that he doesn't know yet himself. What are you guys trying to pull? A.T.

To: Al C who wrote (14159)	7/10/1998 4:37:00 PM
From: Henry Volquardsen	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 20681

To Al C or may I call you David or do you prefer Mr Snow You are a knowledgeable individual and I was hoping you could settle an argument I was having with a friend. We were discussing the issue of privacy and the internet. Specifically the issue debated was individuals who participate on various discussion forums, such as SI, using aliases. The question was wether their identities would be revealed in a legal proceeding such as a criminal fraud investigation or an SEC inquiry into stock manipulation. Since their names, e-mail addresses and ISP numbers are all available to the various services such as SI it was my opinion that this information could be obtained with a subpoena. He thought they might be protected my some sort of privacy rule, like when you talk to a priest. Which of us do you think is right?