To: Oeconomicus who wrote (9940 ) 7/10/1998 4:47:00 PM From: umbro Respond to of 164684
Bob, thanks for the clarification on the 5 mil. share offering. I agree that I was mistaken. I interpreted the word "may" as "might" (ie, when a company says "it may from time to time ...", it means its possible, but not mandatory), and since it didn't say "may only ...", I thought the option of the company itself registering these shares for sale and then using the cash for acquisition was still a possibility. After all, eventually the 5 mil. shares will be dillutive even if companies being acquired are required to wait a year before they can sell the stock. Anyway, you're right this won't affect the float in the near term. On the issue of how to count the float ... I was just using the procedure that Marketguide uses for all the other companies that it follows: to use the shares that are not owned by insiders, or registered 5% owners. The people at Marketguide indicate that the new number for the float that will appear in their report will be 19.3M , this reflects 61% of the outstanding (sans the psosbile 5M used for acquisition). The number that Marketguide listed previously, and that was picked up by the media was 6.0M, which makes for quite a difference. It is possible that the float is still tightly held, and a lot less than 19 mil. I don't know if funds for example take delivery of shares to keep them from being borrowed by short-sellers. As to why it is so difficult to find shares to short, it is just possible that a lot more than the June figure of 8 mil. shares are now held short. (I checked with Dreyfus today. They said that they could've gotten ahold of both AMZN and INKT today to short ... I was asking about 1K shares. They said the situation is changing day-to-day though.)