Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Naxos Resources (NAXOF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (14177)	7/10/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: W.F. Schwertley	Respond to of 20681

Tom, I think we need more data from independent certified companies. Until then, the SFA and the J/L assay methods are both suspect IMO. As far as the infighting on this thread, if you are afraid to divulge your real name when posting, I will listen, but you will get no support from me. WFS

To: Tom Frederick who wrote (14177)	7/10/1998 4:11:00 PM
From: Jerry in Omaha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 20681

Mr. Frederick, Perhaps you did not re-visit #reply-853253 February 20, 1997, where I suggested we who post on this thread rank on the corporate totem pole: "Anyone getting themselves into a lather regarding 'we stockholders' better get a good grip on reality and look at the ownership and power distribution curve in this company. There will be change making decisions made; you can count on that. There will only be a handful of persons making those decisions, count on that too. Anyone owning less than, say X00,000 shares will be rabble getting little respect." The recent proxy appeals on this thread are evidence that someone is coming up short and defaulting to supplicating the rabble on this thread for support. Of course there's the tantalizing suggestion that power hangs in the balance of the proxy power this thread represents. Hmmmmm...now there's something to consider. Jerard P