SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Year 2000 (Y2K) Embedded Systems & Infrastructure Problem -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: John Mansfield who wrote (508)7/10/1998 3:07:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 618
 
'
81. Author: David C. Hall ( dhall )
Date: Jun. 22 9:04 PM 1998

Any device, item of equipment, or system that
contains a microprocessor with a Real Time
Clock has a potential date dependency. The
dates/times/ etc. could have been set at the
factory and maintained by the built-in battery
until it is used. Some built-in batteries last
for 10 years or more. If a device has a battery
then it probably has an RTC. All RTCs (except
some from Dallas Semiconductor) will roll to
1900 on January 1, 2000. If the system microcode
has not been designed to account for this (and
most has not) the device could fail or produce
erroneous data.
Note that many devices have three or more modes
of operation - operational, calibration, and
maintenance. At any time a date may be added,
checked, or accounted for. At time of
manufacture, a date could have been used for
some purpose (such as testing) and never used
again. Multifunction microprocessors are
cheap and are found in real strange places. So if
a device cannot have a date input as it stands,
that does not mean that it has no date
dependency.
My basic recommendation is as follows: If it
uses electricity, it is guilty until proven
innocent. We cannot afford to ASSUME anything.
Check out everything you have time to do.
Establish a priority checklist based on
criticality of the function and test as far down
as you can get. Or at least ask the vendor to
certify "compliancy" in writing. If they will
not, you got a problem.

Dave Hall
dhall@enteract.com

___

From the SIM forum

year2000.unt.edu



To: John Mansfield who wrote (508)7/10/1998 6:00:00 PM
From: John Mansfield  Respond to of 618
 
telegraph.co.uk:80/et?ac=000158118408973&&pg=/et/98/7/9/ecfbug09.html