Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : SAP A.G. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Diver who wrote (1377)	7/10/1998 7:55:00 PM
From: Jay	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3424

Re "He's in at 51" I believe "she's in at 51" is more correct, if I'm not mistaken.

To: Diver who wrote (1377)	7/10/1998 8:18:00 PM
From: Ibexx	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 3424

Steven and thread, You guys have been gossiping again while I was away? <g> In fact, I was in NY all day for a meeting and didn't watch the market action. It probably wouldn't have made any difference any way since I usually waited till the panic subsided before any action was taken: Here are my perspectives--strictly mine--so please read at your own risk: (1) If there is additional parallelism between SAP and MSFT, it will be the style of their senior management in handing IR. I would somwhat discount the negative "tone" used in SAP's statement. (2) Doesn't surprise me trade wags like CNBC were trying to put a negative spin on the situation; you see, this would be the last chance US institutions could drive down the stock for their own inventory building. (3) Maria may be a good looker, boy is she hollow between the ears.... However, she plays an useful role as a contrarian indicator. (4) I am ready with $$$ and will take action early next week. Might have done something today had I not been away. Do your own home work and don't take my word for it. Ibexx (elated by opportunity)